Thursday, April 25, 2024
HomeViewpointsColumnsColumn: New state logo draws controversy... with good reason

Column: New state logo draws controversy… with good reason

By now, just about everyone has seen the new proposed state logo for the state of Tennessee and it is almost unanimously hated.

The logo, itself, is very simple: just the state abbreviation in a red box, with white and blue lines underneath. The popular criticism for the logo is that a child could probably make it (and they probably could). The kicker for most people is not, in fact, how simple the logo is; it’s the price tag for the logo: a whopping $46,000.

David Smith, a spokesperson for Gov. Bill Haslam, confirmed to The Tennessean on Tuesday, May 26, that the reported cost of the logo was indeed $46,000 and was designed by Nashville-based firm GS&F. However, the new logo would not be replacing the tri-star logo and Tennessee flag that everyone is familiar with.

“To be clear, nothing is happening to the flag, tri-stars or state seal,” Smith told The Tennessean. “There is no singular graphic identity for state government currently. This [is] about a consistent graphic identity for state government. The flag and tri-stars are bigger than state government.”

Even though this new logo is not going to replace the tri-star logo that everyone is familiar with, $46,000 is a lot of money that could be put to a lot better use. Does the state really need any more logos? Not really. Why not make the tri-star logo the ‘consistent graphic identity’ for state government? It makes absolutely no sense to be spending that kind of money on something so needless. There are plenty of other projects the state could use the taxpayers’ money on.

What’s especially troubling is that the company that designed the logo won the contract because they were the lowest bid, which to be fair, is how business works. But they released a product that someone at the fifth-grade level could design in Microsoft Word within 10 minutes. If the state is absolutely set on spending $46,000 on a new logo, why not use the talent of a college student? Why not use give a graphic design major, who’s struggling with student loan debt, the chance to prove that they’ve learned something? There isn’t a graphic design major or graduate that would turn that down. Plus, their work would probably be worth the $46,000 that was spent.

The point is, there are a lot of better uses for $46,000 in taxpayer money other than another new logo, and if we’re going to spend that kind of money on a logo, at least make it a decent one.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Chance Farmer
Chance Farmer
Senior Communications major at the University of Tennessee at Martin; Co-Executive Editor of The Pacer
RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Stephen Yeargin on About
Colby Anderson on About
Charles E. Coleman on About
Jeanna Jordan on God’s chosen Cowboy
Josh Lemons, former PacerEE on Trotting back to Martin
Tiffany Griffin on Trotting back to Martin
Laura Crossett on Advertising
Jennifer on Advertising
Marcus Allen Wakefield on DC vs. Marvel: The fight everyone wins
Concerned UTM Alum on Pacer addresses YOUniversity issues
Alex Wilson - Former SGA President on Pacer addresses YOUniversity issues
Chris Morris (Pledge Trainer) on UTM ATO chapter to close
Recent Alumnus on Voice It!: ATO closes at UTM
Anonymous 2 on UTM ATO chapter to close
Chris Morris (Pledge Trainer) on UTM ATO chapter to close
Otis Glazebrook on Voice It!: ATO closes at UTM
Jim bob tucker on UTM ATO chapter to close
Jennifer Witherspoon on Student remembered, celebrated for life
Samantha Drewry on Two killed in motorcycle crash
Anecia Ann Price on … and in with the new